Sunday, December 21, 2008
Shrek the Third
#1: When King Harold falls ill, he tells Shrek that there is one other heir who can become the new King of Far Far Away: his nephew, ARTHUR PENDRAGON!!!!
#2: When Shrek, Donkey, and Puss in Boots arrive at Worcestershire Academy to find "Artie", they find that he is used as a punching bag by the school Jousting Team, led by LANCELOT DE LAC!!!
#3: When Shrek announces to the Academy (during a costume contest or such) that Arthur is to be King, Arthur picks up the courage to tell off everyone who has ever been mean to him, and admits his love to GWENHWYFAR who is sitting in the crowd (and just happens to say "Eww" when he does so)
#4: On the way back to Far Far Away, Donkey and Puss in Boots scare Arthur with their ramblings of the responsibilities of being a king, and Arthur inadvertently crashes the ship into an island, where they meet Arthur's retired wizard teacher, MERLIN!!!
I wonder now if there are even more connections, so I'm off to see when Shrek the Third will be playing again, so I can analyze it more thoroughly. :)
Betrayal, The Male's Perspective
Opening arguments saw affirmative debater Adam Young defining betrayal as deception. Mr. Young argued that "without trust, love is not possible", and therefor Gertrude did not even love her family, as she did not trust young Hamlet's actions, plotting to spy on Hamlet with Claudius and Polonius. The negative debater Tyler Keith counter-argued that Hamlet only feels betrayed because Gertrude re-married so quickly (she could have simply moved on quickly). Mr. Keith also argued that Gertrude could not have betrayed her family because the Ghost of old Hamlet begged young Hamlet not to harm his mother because she is not at fault. He further argued that Gertrude could have grieved off-stage, and re-married only to solidify Hamlet's position to the throne.
Rebuttals saw members of the affirmative side arguing that there is no grieving present by Gertrude. Hamlet even goes so far to make a fool of her with the use of his play, and she does nothing but shrug it off. The affirmative side also argued that Gertrude did truly betray her family, and continued to by telling Claudius of Hamlet's insanity. The negative side quickly counter-stated that Gertrude is obviously telling Claudius of Hamlet's insanity so that he may go to school, and plays along with Hamlet so that Claudius thinks not of him as a threat. The negative side continued to oppose the arguments of the affirmative side by taking Mr. Young's definition of betrayal and stating that since there is no deception between Hamlet and Gertrude, there is no betrayal.
Second arguments saw affirmative debater Stu Gendron insisting that Gertrude did not care for Hamlet because she did not mourn his death. He continued this plea by arguing that the play about Hamlet's death did not affect her, therefore her betrayal is obvious. Negative debater Alex van der Mout ignored the affirmative side's repetitive pleas by stating that the Ghost knew Gertrude meant no harm, so it is obvious there is not betrayal on her part. Mr. van der Mout also mentioned that at the time of this Shakespearean play, men did not have to tell their wives of what they did, so Gertrude was likely unaware of Claudius' murderous acts.
To counter this argument, the affirmative side argued that a hallucination (Hamlet's ghost) should not be a basis of argument, because they are not real). The negative side ignored this statement and continued to insist that betrayal is not linked to deception, and that the Queen was not saddened by the play because she did not make the connection. Mr. Hughes-khatib ended the second rebuttal by stating, "We have a Jehovah's Witness, a Mormon, and me on this team - we don't lie."
The free-for-all showed the male's perspectives on this debate, as Mr. Keith opened with a dramatic monologue, which was followed by Mr. Keith winning a sword fight against Mr. Young, and Mr. Hughes-khatib winning a sword fight against Mr. Gendron. Where no authentic arguments were made, Shakespearean insults were thrown left and right, in a disinteresting round.
Final arguments saw the affirmative debater Matt Brown insisting that Gertrude is nothing but selfish throughout the play, marrying only for her own wealth. He further concluded that Gertrude has indeed betrayed young Hamlet by calling him crazy. Negative debater Jon Hughes-khatib countered by correcting Mr. Brown, saying "marrying for wealth is selfish, not betrayal." He continued on to say that Gertrude even shows her care about Hamlet's mental health, caring for him as a whole. Gertrude, he argued, sacrificed herself by drinking poison so Hamlet would not drink it.
Final rebuttals saw repetition of all previous statements. The debate concluded at 10:54AM, when the judges announced the negative side as the winners, due to Mr. Keith's monologue, and many sword fighting wins. The affirmative side lost, although they pointed out more fallacies. Overall, the debate on betrayal gave many male perspectives of both sides of the argument.
A Shaky Performance
Opening arguments saw little factual information from the affirmative side, as they quickly dissolved under the heat in the classroom (and heat due to the knowledge that loss would be imminent). The negative side quickly demonstrated an appeal to flattery, revealing t-shirts under their sweaters, each having a judge's name within a heart drawn onto it. Debater Stephanie Boucher argued that Shakespearean tragedy involves protagonists that are larger than life, and take extreme action. Readers easily reach catharsis in Shakespearean tragedy, whereas in modern tragedy, readers have difficulties doing so.
Rebuttals saw the affirmative side reproaching Ms. Boucher for speaking too fast, as well as stating dully that modern tragedy is better than Shakespearean because it is more civilized. The affirmative quickly counter-stated that modern tragedy is not always civilized, but is always simplified. In simplifying the tragedy, the affirmative side argued that context could easily be lost, concluding that Shakespearean tragedy fits all tragedies, whereas modern tragedies do not.
The second round of arguments saw the affirmative side cracking sexist jokes, as well as many blond jokes targeting the negative team's debaters. Second arguments saw disorganization among the affirmative side, giving many repetitive examples of "new" tragedy being better than "old" tragedy. The negative side lost much of their oompf, slowing down their fast-paced arguments to sink to the level of repetition best-portrayed by affirmative debater Dawson Lybbert.
The rebuttals following the second round were weak and disorganized, leading up to a free-for-all with much screaming and little information.
The debate finally concluded at around 2:40 PM, with no closing arguments that supported both side's positions.
The negative side won with a score of 24 points, stamping out the 4 points awarded to the affirmative side.
Monday, December 15, 2008
Activity 1.6
The transformation of Hamlet is shown in many different ways:
Actions: The dramatic changes in Hamlet's actions greatly back up Hamlet's transformation. He goes from being gentle and loving at one moment (touching Ophelia's face and pronouncing his love) and then becoming a murderous wreck (killing Polonius and using the excuse that he thought it was Claudius).
Appearance: The comparison of his actions at the beginning of the play and his actions at the end of the play is possibly the best way to map out Hamlet's transformation. He evidently goes from being normal and grieving, to murderous and unyielding.
Feelings: Emotion is a strong driving-force for Hamlet's transformation. All the hate and anger that Hamlet feels towards almost everyone brings out the worst in him, changing him into something rude and villainous.
Speech: Hamlet possesses a naturally convincing way of speaking, that is both powerful and captivating. This is perhaps exemplified best when he speaks extravagantly of what the actors on stage are attempting to put across.
Thoughts: A very self-explanatory example of Hamlet's transformation, his suicidal and homicidal thoughts are something to be left undesired.
These transformations, however biased, are observed differently by people close and distant to him:
Claudius: Having only fully realized Hamlet's transformation at the time of the play, Claudius used Hamlet's insanity as a cover-up for his obvious murderous act. In short, Claudius viewed all of Hamlet's transformations as madness.
Gertrude: Until she confronts him, Gertrude believes Hamlet to be completely sane. It is only after their meeting that she comes to believe that his transformations have lead him to insanity, as he is seeing things (the Ghost in his mother's room).
Horatio: Throughout the play, Horatio was aware of Hamlet's act and realized that he was NOT in fact insane, and that the transformations of Hamlet weren't as drastic as others believed. Horatio accepted his best friend's changes, even though Hamlet's thoughts were murderous and mischievous at times.
Ophelia: Having killed her father, Ophelia is forced to believe that Hamlet's transformations are indeed malicious and he is in fact insane. However, Ophelia lives in denial for the majority of the play, as she loves Hamlet so, and does not wish to believe that he has changed in the way others think him to have changed.
Activity 1.4: The Argumentative Essay
Reason: Yes, literally.
Example: In Shakespearean literature, an insane character exhibits behavior that goes against societal norms, sometimes endangering those around them or even themselves.
Example: His soliloquies, which are based off of death and tragedy... not something so openly talked about by a sane person at that time. (3.1.64-98)
Reason: Yes, clinically/psychologically/medically...
Example: Hamlet exhibits traits characteristic to mania and schizophrenia, as well as bipolar disorder and several other psychotic disorders.
Example: Hamlet's grief sets in so deeply that his thoughts of sorrow and suicide get the better of him, fueling his hate and drive for revenge. (within 3.1.64-98)
Reason: Yes, legally.
Example: Hamlet cannot be held responsible for his actions because he is legally insane, showing know appreciation of the nature and quality of his wrong-doing.
Activity 1.3
- Hamlet, King of Denmark, has just passed away.
- Queen Gertrude, widow of the late King Hamlet, marries Claudius (King Hamlet's brother)
- Hamlet has visions of the ghost of his dead father, and is asked to seek revenge for his murder.
- Hamlet is thought to be mad.
- Repressed feelings burst forth when the relationship between Ophelia and Hamlet is unaccepted.
Hamlet: While grieving the loss of his father, Prince Hamlet meets the ghost of his deceased father, who begs of him to seek revenge. Hamlet agrees to this most willingly. After toying with Ophelia's emotions, murdering several people, and frightening his mother with his crazed actions, Hamlet dies at the hands of Laertes and his poisoned foil.
Laertes: Laertes has a strong love for his family, and when both Ophelia and Polonius are taken away from him, he feels the need to exact revenge on Prince Hamlet. After long consideration, Laertes and Claudius agree to having Laertes challenge Hamlet to a mock fight, using a poisoned foil. He thus kills Hamlet, but is in turn killed himself.
Claudius: The cause of his brother's death, Claudius attempts several times to eliminate the threat of Prince Hamlet (exiling him, plotting to kill with a poisoned foil, attempting to kill with poisoned wine). Being the one to produce the conflict within the play, it is only right that he becomes the one that later puts end to the lives of many of the characters within the play, including himself. Claudius, by attempting to murder young Hamlet, causes the death of his dear Gertrude, as well as himself.
Gertrude: After the mysterious death of her husband, King Hamlet, Gertrude remarries Claudius (for reasons unknown to us). Noting the strangeness of her son's behavior, she seems to follow along with Claudius' plans, but still appears to somewhat care for her son. In the end, agreeing to follow Claudius' directions leads her to drink from the cup of poisoned wine, dying.
Ophelia: Ophelia's reality is a bitter one; she loses two men she loves so dearly: her love Hamlet, and her father Polonius. The loss of these two important figures in her personal life might well be what triggered her mysterious death, as she became confused as to who to trust and accept.
Polonius: Throughout the play, Polonius shows nothing but hatred towards Hamlet, due to the fact that he is so madly in love with his daughter Ophelia. Being a councilor to King Claudius, he is more than willing to attend to his plans and pushes the plot against Prince Hamlet forward. Had he not been so willing to please Claudius (by agreeing to hide behind curtains in Gertrude's room to eavesdrop on her conversation with young Hamlet), he would not have been murdered so brutally by Hamlet, who mistook him for Claudius.
Importance of the family unit to society:
I believe that it is important to have a strong family unit in society. Many of the social skills that we need are learned from family members. However, for a family unit to be successful and of any value, it is necessary for there to be love, caring, understanding, and a positive environment for learning. To learn the necessary social skills to be considered "normal" among others, a secure family unit is necessary, to teach these social skills and other skills of importance. A family must be secure, comfortable, and consistent, so that it is easier to learn, and one can become or attentive in a positive environment.
Activity 1.2
Hamlet's Family:

Crisis: Within this family, the obvious crisis is the murder of King Hamlet, and the betrayal within that act. King Claudius, uncle to Prince Hamlet, murders old Hamlet and marries his widow, Gertrude. It is through this act of betrayal that Hamlet attempts to avenge his father, harming all around him in the process.
Coping method(s): Prince Hamlet copes with the betrayal by plotting out revenge on Claudius, and attempting to follow through (in the end succeeding).
Ophelia's Family:

Polonius, councilor to King Claudius, is the father of Ophelia, Prince Hamlet's love, and Laertes, her brother. (Note that Polonius is the only known parent of Ophelia and Laertes, and is therefore the only one presented in the family tree.)
Crisis: What is considered a crisis within Ophelia's family is that she is in love with Hamlet. This does not fare well with her father Polonius, who aided Claudius in murdering old Hamlet. It is the forbidding of their love that drives Ophelia to madness (and eventually suicide), and the rest of the family to disruption and eventual death.
Coping method(s): Ophelia commits suicide (or so it is expected), so she does not show signs of coping. Polonius is murdered and displays no means of coping. Laertes, however, copes with his family's disruption by plotting revenge on Prince Hamlet.
A nuclear family, simply put, is a family with a mother, a father, and one or more children. Before King Hamlet dies, their family is nuclear, having all the parts associated with a family. When King Hamlet dies and Gertrude marries Claudius, the image of a nuclear family dissolves into a almost incestuous relationship. In terms of Ophelia's family, I would not quite consider it nuclear, because Ophelia and Laertes lack a mother figure. If a mother was present, Ophelia's family would represent a nuclear family quite vividly, having a mother, father, daughter, and son.
ISU #2
The Mists of Avalon: The Opposition Within
For: Mr. Murray
Michaela Blaser
ENG 4UE | December 15, 2008
The Mists of Avalon, written by Marion Zimmer Bradley, is “a monumental reimaging of the Arthurian legends”, as said by The New York Times Book Review. It is a compelling story, the magical legend of King Arthur as it is seen through the eyes and lives of the women who held power behind the throne. But it is not only that which makes The Mists of Avalon such a spellbinding story. The very two-sidedness of the various dualities gives matter to greater intellectual thought and captivates the reader’s attention. Some of the various polar themes include passivity versus activity, intuition versus logic, internal issues versus external issues, and follower versus leader. However, the oppositions within The Mists of Avalon that are perhaps most important to the novel are those of duty in opposition to desire, Christianity versus Druidism, and the role of women as opposed to the role of men.
From the very beginning of The Mists of Avalon, the choosing of what is right and what is easy is an observable battle. Each character, however unique, faces a similar trial based on what is expected of them due to their social status. Each character must do what is their duty and pay no attention to (as best they can) what they truly do desire. Though there are many examples that arise of this all-too-common battle, those that stand out are the judgments of Igraine, Morgaine, and Gwenhwyfar.
“‘No! I have a husband, and I have borne him a child! I will not let you play again at skipping-stones with my life! I married as you bade me – and you will never know –’ The words choked in her throat. There would never be any way to tell them of the first year; even Viviane would never know. She could say, I was afraid, or I was alone and terrified, or Rape would have been easier because I could have run away to die afterward, but any of those would have been only words, conveying only the smallest part of what she had felt.” (Bradley, 15-16)
Igraine was but fifteen years old when she was forced to marry Gorlois, handed over to the Duke of Cornwall as a gift from Avalon. In the above quote, she is just beginning to understand what Taliesin, the Merlin of Britain, and Vivian, the Lady of Avalon, are telling her: she is predestined to have an affair with Uther Pendragon, a king destined to become High King. This arrangement angers Igraine, as she has gone through great pains from the marriage to Gorlois that Taliesin and Vivian had forced unto her years ago. This event alone had been an unwilling choice she had had to make between what she desired and what was easy (not marrying Gorlois) and what was her duty, as a priestess of Avalon.
“‘It is a matter of honor,’ she repeated. ‘I owe him this. He let me keep Morgaine, when she was all I had in my loneliness. He has been kind and patient, and for a man of his years it cannot be easy. He wants a son, he believes it all-important to his life and honor, and I will not deny him this.’ … I did [Viviane’s] will once, when I was a child and knew no better. But now I am grown, I am a woman, not so easily led as the child she gave away to be Gorlois’s bride. Now I will do my own will, and not that of the Lady of the Lake.” (Bradley, 17-19)
Igraine was also plenty outraged, claiming she would never cheat on her husband because he was good to her, allowing her to keep her daughter Morgaine with her, instead of sending her off for fostering. She also believed greatly that it was her duty to bare Gorlois a son, as was expected of a wife. At this point, Igraine’s choice duty is to her husband, as his her desire, but the duty chosen for her is to marry Uther, leaving her with a greater desire to remain faithful to her husband, Gorlois. But Igraine then meets Uther, while accompanying her husband to a royal meeting. Although nothing becomes of their chance meetings, Gorlois charges her with adultery and soon initiates a war against Uther. Through her anger at the unreasonable accusations of infidelity, Igraine finds she lusts for Uther. Once having desired Gorlois and followed her desires, she once again follows her desire (though it was once duty) in marrying Uther and having his child.
Igraine’s daughter, Morgaine, inherits a similar predicament when facing the task of what is right and dutiful, and what is easy and desired. Shortly after the marriage of her mother to Uther, Viviane discovers greatness in Morgaine, and takes her to Avalon to become a High Priestess there. She pursues her duties well… until her charming cousin flashes a smile her way.
“They ate slowly, licking their fingers free of the honey, and he reached for her hand, taking it up playfully and sucking a bit of honey of her finger. ‘How sweet you are, cousin,’ he said, laughing, and she felt her whole body alive with the touch. She picked up his hand to return the gesture, and suddenly dropped it as if it had burned her; to him it was only a game, perhaps, but it could never be so to her…’I am virgin while the Goddess wills; most likely I am to be kept for the Great Marriage…’” (Bradley, 152-153)
When Lancelet, the previously stated ‘charming cousin’, and Morgaine go off together to climb a steep mountain, Lancelet uses some of his more flirtatious qualities to make Morgaine challenge her duties as High Priestess of Avalon. One of these greater duties is remaining chaste, even though her desire is to sleep with Lancelet. But as she is so highly ranked and highly respected, she must keep to her duty and push aside her desires for Lancelet. It is only later that she comes to regret this decision. Having kept her virginity, she met the requirements to participate in a ritual known as the ‘Great Marriage’, which ended with Morgaine sleeping with her brother… and becoming pregnant.
“‘What has happened to the lady Morgaine?’ [asked Viviane]. ‘Lady –’ the young woman said stammering, ‘she – she was not in her room, and I asked everywhere. I found – I found this in her room,’ she said, holding out the veil and deerskin tunic, the silver crescent and the little sickle knife which Morgaine had been given at her initiation, ‘And they told me on the shore that she had summoned the barge and gone away to the mainland. They thought she went by your orders.’” (Bradley, 229)
Forbidden to terminate the life of the unborn child (for he would come to be the greatest of kings), she becomes angry beyond belief, and renounced her duties. Her life was soon after guided by her own desires, what she alone wished to do or not.
Gwenhwyfar was cast into a similar arrangement as that which had befallen Igraine at her young age of fifteen, only Gwenhwyfar had a few more years to her age. Daughter of King Leodegranz, Gwenhwyfar was prearranged to marry the High King Arthur. Although she was used as merely a bartering chip for alliances between Arthur and Leodegranz, Gwenhwyfar came to love Arthur dearly, and wished upon him all the best. Early on in their marriage, Gwenhwyfar desired her duty of being wed to Arthur. Only later did she come to fear she was not upholding her duty as much as she would long to. She was in her own eyes, and the mocking eyes of all else, barren. It was her desire to bear a child, and her duty to do so as well, but lack of following through with her duty of giving birth to an heir dampened her desire for her husband, even though she was forever determined to remain faithful to him. Later on, however, she began to desire Lancelet for the same flirtatious qualities that had driven Morgaine so very close to disposing of her rightly duties. Even though her duties then lied with Arthur, her desires were intended for Lancelet.
“‘When I think of that – that animal, touching you –’ [Lancelet] said, with his face muffled against her breast, ‘and I who love you barely dare to lay a hand on you-’
“And for all her faithfulness, she had only come to this; God had rewarded her virtue and self-restraint by betraying her into [self-declared brother’s] hands for rape and brutality! And Lancelet, who had offered her love and tenderness, who had scrupulously stepped aside that he might not betray his kinsman – he had to witness it!... She no longer cared, nor felt restraint. Arthur? Arthur had not protected her from ravishment, She had suffered what she had to suffer, and now, at least, she would have this much.” (Bradley, 519)
At that point in time, Gwenhwyfar had suffered through a horrible kidnapping by a man who claimed to be her brother. Believing that Arthur would not have rescued her as Lancelet did, she submitted to her desire for him, and soon lost all concern for her duty to Arthur. In the end, Gwenhwyfar ran away with Lancelet, leaving her with both the duty to Lancelet, and the desire to do that duty; “Clinging to Lancelet’s back, her gown pulled up above her knees and her bare legs hanging down, Gwenhwyfar closed her eyes as they rode hard through the night. She had no idea where they were going…” (Bradley, 860)
One might wonder why marriage was forced upon Igraine in such a manner, or why Morgaine was made to follow such ludicrous protocol, or why Gwenhwyfar struggled so greatly in attempting to make the right decisions. It is essential to know that all these predicaments occur, in a great part, because of the opposition between the two major religions of the time: Christianity and Druidism. The actions of all persons inhabiting the British Isles between the 2nd century BC and the 2nd century AD (the approximate time that the events within The Mists of Avalon took place) were influenced by the conflicting religions.
Christianity, in general, works off of the centrality of the person of Jesus Christ. A great emphasis within Christianity is put on private devotion and individual prayer.
“…Christian way of life, one that is informed by the call to discipleship and service. The inherent worth of every person as one who has been created in the image of God, the sanctity of human life and thus the marriage and the family, the imperative to strive for justice even in a fallen world – all of these are dynamic moral commitments that Christians would accept, however much their own conduct may fall short of these norms.” (Pelikan)
In The Mists of Avalon, Christianity is a religion that is beginning to occupy the hearts and minds of many people. Gwenhwyfar is the perfect image of a Christian. She does many things to strengthen the Christian religion in Arthur’s kingdom, the most significant of which is potentially the making of the Christian banner. When Gwenhwyfar weaves a Christian banner to replace that of the Druids, she reflects her Christian belief by using her own hands to work on it.
“It was most beautiful as she planned it – blue, with gold thread, and her priceless crimson-dyed silks for the mantle of the Virgin… And into every stitch of this banner shall I weave my prayers that Arthur shall be safe, and this a Christian land from Tintagel to Lothian….” (Bradley, 384)
She also shows great service to her God by means of silent and personal prayer throughout the making of the banner. How does Christianity impact the lives of Igraine, Morgaine, and Gwenhwyfar? Igraine never really shows visible signs of truly following the Christian faith, as she is devoted to Druidism. At the beginning of The Mists of Avalon, she even goes as far as to throw a priest out of her living quarters, as she believes that all he tells is disgraceful lies.
“‘Go and the Devil take you, so that you come not into my presence,’ and turned her back. ‘If you presume to curse me, woman-’ ‘Why should I waste my breath with a curse? I would as willingly bid you Godspeed to your own heaven, and may your God find more pleasure in your company than I do.’” (Bradley, 82)
Her daughter Morgaine is influenced very little by the Christian faith when she is but a child, still living with her mother. Perhaps this is why Morgaine accepted Druidism so easily, when she was taken to Avalon by Viviane. It is only later in life that Morgaine questions her religion, because of the pain it has brought to her (i.e. falling pregnant to her own brother during a Druid ceremony). Morgaine eventually begins to accept some of the Christian beliefs, but still holds strongly on most of the Druid aspects. Gwenhwyfar is quite opposite of Morgaine, growing up in a Christian home. It is her very up-bringing that leads her to believe so strongly in her Christian faith, and thus makes great drastic changes to her lifestyle. It is only when she begins to commit adulterous acts that she questions if Christianity is really all it is made out to be.
“‘And as for Lancelet, we must by now have given him time to be gone from the Queen’s chamber…’ [said Morgaine] And indeed when Elaine and Morgaine reached the Queen, there was no sign of the presence there of Lancelet, or any other man. But once, when Elaine was for a moment beyond earshot, Gwenhwyfar met Morgaine’s eyes, and Morgaine thought she had never met such awful bitterness. ‘You despise me, do you not, Morgaine?’ For once, Morgaine thought, Gwenhwyfar has voiced the question that has been in her thoughts all these weeks. She felt like hurling back a sharp answer – If I do so, is it not because you have first despised me? But she said as gently as she could, ‘I am not you confessor, Gwenhwyfar, and you, not I, are the one who professes belief in a God who will damn you because you share your bed with a man who is not your husband. My Goddess is gentler with women.’” (Bradley, 525)
And so it is true: the Druid Goddess is gentler, but in many more ways than with women.
Druidism is a religious faith of the ancient Celtic inhabitants of the British Isles, and in the parts of Britain that were not invaded by the Romans, Druidism survived until it was replaced by Christianity, two or three years later. (Unknown) In The Mists of Avalon, Druidism is the pagan religion that is the leading power of the Land of Avalon. Although it slowly fades away as priests and bishops come to power, the Druidism power behind the throne secretly controls all of Britain. It is the priestesses of Avalon and the Merlin of Britain (highest rank of Druids) that are consulted when major changes are to be made to the control of the country. Specifically in the case of the Merlin of Britain, we see many examples of leaders that seek out the Merlin to be one of the more trusted councilors (i.e. Ambrosius, Uther, Arthur). Where the Christian faith is one of decency and appropriateness, Druidism can be argued to be a faith of sexuality and openness (both appropriate and inappropriate).
“‘Where is Avalloch?’ [asked Morgaine]. [Accolon] laughed shortly. ‘He is gone down to the village to lie with the Spring Maiden… it is one of our customs that the village priest does not know…’” (Bradley, 587)
An example of a Druid activity would be the Beltane rites, which put simply, was a night of activities that involved blessing the fertility of the lands and of the women. The above excerpt exemplifies the type of activity common to this practice. This act of adoration and sanction would be considered most unsuitable in the Christian sphere of influence. It is one of the greater reasons why many, including Gwenhwyfar who thought the rites disgusting, attempted to establish the Christian faith enough to replace the Druid faith.
But where it is insisted that Christianity replaces Druidism, we must not believe so. A duality that helps exemplify this argument is the opposition between the role of women and the role of men. Druidism ideally encourages women to “free themselves from patriarchal morals and restrictions. The religion symbolizes the feminine power that has been repressed in the Christian world.” (Huang) Druidism is sometimes referred to as the Goddess religion because of the feminine power it embodies. In her role as the priestess of Druidism, Morgaine symbolizes matriarchal freedom. For women of the Druid faith, weakness only exists in a thwarted mission.
In the Christian faith, however, women are characters of weakness. An example of this is when King Leodegranz gives Gwenhwyfar to Arthur to be married… as an extra with a gift of horses.
“‘I have daughters; when the eldest marries her husband will lead my men into battle, and can train him as he will. Tell your High King to come here, and we will discuss the matter… Beseech him, then, to come to an old man who does not want to ride out from him own fireside… If he will not come for me, perhaps he will come to know how I will dispose of my horses and the armed men to ride them.’” (Bradley, 254)
The parallel between Gwenhwyfar and the horses explicitly implies weakness on her part. After winning her way with establishing the Christian banner, it is apparent that the only way that a Christian woman can access power is to hold the power of creation. In Gwenhwyfar’s case, her faith holds her power. There are many cases within The Mists of Avalon where we see the prohibition of discussing (or even mentioning) the Goddess. In the greater part of Britain, “women’s power is repressed, brought down by male society members. The attitude towards women resembles the attitude toward pagan religion.” (Huang) Christianity can not allow Druidism to exist in conjunction with it, which causes the priests within The Mists of Avalon to be blind towards the fact that women hold the ultimate power over men through their power of creation. It is obvious through comparison that the women of the Druid faith have more respect and are favored for advice over the men of the Druid faith, whereas the women of the Christian faith are not called upon to represent themselves and their opinions, among the men of their equivalent faith.
In conclusion, the opposition within The Mists of Avalon brings out the best – and worst – of the individuals that struggle with the duality of fighting for what they desire as opposed to what they hold in duty, what is easy over what is right, and what is wanted of them as opposed to what is expected of them. The contrasting of Christianity and Druidism helps give further insight into the trials that may have affected the though-process of Igraine, Morgaine, and Gwenhwyfar as they struggled to choose between duty and desire. Through the examination of the roles of women and men within these two central religions, it is crucial to understand that the choices between duty and desire, and Christianity and Druidism build the roles of both men and women, throughout Avalon and the British Isles.
Bibliography:
Book(s)
Zimmer Bradley, Marion. The Mists of Avalon. New York: Ballantine Books, 1982.
Web Document(s)
Huang, Dina. "Mists of Avalon: From Druidism to Christianity, Replacement or Reincarnation." Agleam.net. 2002. 14 Dec 2008
"The Mists of Avalon." LitLovers. 2006. LitLovers. 14 Dec 2008
Encyclopedia(s)
Pelikan, Jaroslav. "Christianity." Microsoft Encarta Encyclopedia. CD-ROM.2002 ed.Canada: Microsoft Corporation, 2001.
"Druidism." Microsoft Encarta Encyclopedia. CD-ROM.2002 ed.Canada: Microsoft Corporation, 2001.